Another Look At Qualitative Data Analysis For Mac

Computer Assisted Qualitative Data AnalysiS software (CAQDAS) has been around for quite a while, and has assisted researchers in analyzing primarily text-based documents and storing that analysis in a findable and interactive manner. CAQDAS can help researchers to 'code,' or identify the occurrence of, various conceptual themes present across a corpus of documents in order to bring them together and pull insight from them. Namma ooru nayagan songs masstamilan. Social Psychologists may use a CAQDAS platform to code the responses to interviews, both in text as well as audio, or graduate students may use it to read and keep track of their thoughts for a literature review. The uses are wide and the data management capabilities are many. This guide is meant to expose you to the various options out there and help you to make an informed decision when embarking on a research project that will incorporate a CAQDAS program. Check out a review of some of these platforms here and be sure to read up and make your own comparisons of the various software's websites.

Coding in qualitative data analysis also has its “dirty secrets. These are software packages that need to be installed on a researcher's computer (PC or Mac). (2) adjacent or look-alike applications that on closer inspection don't really. Second, it works in Microsoft Office 2016 for Windows (I have the.

  1. Androutsopoulou A. The self-characterization as a narrative tool: applications in therapy with individuals and families. Fam Process. 2001;40(1):79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell R. Did Hinkle prove laddered constructs are superordinate? A re-examination of his data suggests not. Pers Constr Theory Pract. 2014;11:1–4.Google Scholar
  3. Bravington A. Using the Pictor technique to reflect on collaborative working in undergraduate nursing and midwifery placements. Masters thesis, University of Huddersfield; 2011.Google Scholar
  4. Burr V, Giliberto M, Butt T. Construing the cultural other and the self: A Personal Construct analysis of English and Italian perceptions of national character. Int J Intercult Relat. 2014a;39:53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burr V, King N, Butt T. Personal construct psychology methods for qualitative research. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2014b;17(4):341–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burr V, Blyth E, Sutcliffe J, King N. Encouraging self-reflection in social work students: using personal construct methods. Br J Soc Work. 2016;46:1997. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcw014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butt TW. Personal construct theory and method: another look at laddering. Pers Constr Theory Pract. 2007;4:11–4.Google Scholar
  8. Butt TW. George Kelly: the psychology of personal constructs. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Butt T, Bell R, Burr V. Fragmentation and the self. Constructivism Hum Sci. 1997;2(1):12–29.Google Scholar
  10. Elliott D, Brooks J, King N. Support networks of young people with autism spectrum disorder using Pictor: exploring multiple perspectives. (In preparation).Google Scholar
  11. Fransella F. The essential practitioner’s handbook of personal construct psychology. London: Wiley; 2005.Google Scholar
  12. Fransella F, Dalton P. Personal construct counselling in action. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2000.Google Scholar
  13. Hardy B, King N, Firth J. Applying the Pictor technique to research interviews with people affected by advanced disease. Nurse Res. 2012;20(1):6–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hargreaves CP. Social networks and interpersonal constructs. In: Stringer P, Bannister D, editors. Constructs of sociality and individuality. London: Academic Press; 1979. p. 153–75.Google Scholar
  15. Hinkle D. The change of personal constructs from the viewpoint of a theory of implications. Unpublished PhD thesis, Columbus: Ohio State University; 1965.Google Scholar
  16. Johnson K. Visualising mental health with an LGBT community group: method, process, theory. In: Reavey P, editor. Visual methods in psychology: using and interpreting images in visual research. Hove: Psychology Press; 2011. p. 173–89.Google Scholar
  17. Kelly GA. The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton; 1955.Google Scholar
  18. King N, Horrocks C. Interviews in qualitative research. London: Sage; 2010.Google Scholar
  19. King N, Melvin J, Ashby J, Firth J. Community palliative care: Role perception. Br J Community Nurs. 2010;15(2):91–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. King N, Bravington A, Brooks J, Hardy B, Melvin J, Wilde D. The Pictor technique: a method for exploring the experience of collaborative working. Qual Health Res. 2013;23(8):1138–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. King N, Brooks J, Bravington A, Hardy B, Melvin J, Wilde D. The Pictor technique: exploring experiences of collaborative working from the perspectives of generalist and specialist nurses. In: Brooks J, King N, editors. Applied qualitative research in psychology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2017.Google Scholar
  22. Lee R. Doing research on sensitive topics. London: Sage; 1993.Google Scholar
  23. Liamputtog P. Researching the vulnerable: A guide to sensitive research methods. London: Sage; 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Madill A, Jordan A, Shirley C. Objectivity and reliability in qualitative analysis: realist, contextualist and radical constructionist epistemologies. Br J Psychol. 2000;91:1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mercer B. Interviewing people with chronic illness about sexuality: an adaptation of the PLISSIT model. J Clin Nurs. 2008;17(11c):341–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Noble B, King N, Woolmore A, Hughes P, Winslow M, Melvin J, et al. Can comprehensive specialised end of life care be provided at home? Lessons from a study of an innovative consultant-led community service in the UK. Eur J Cancer Care. 2014;24:253–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pink S. Doing visual ethnography. London: Sage; 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pope M, Denicolo P. Transformative education: personal construct approaches to practice and research. London: Whurr; 2001.Google Scholar
  29. Ross A, King N, Firth J. Interprofessional relationships and collaborative working: Encouraging reflective practice. Online J Issues Nurs. 2005;10(1):4. http://www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/TableofContents/Volume102005/No1Jan05/tpc26_316010.htmlGoogle Scholar
  30. Sargeant S, Gross H. Young people learning to live with inflammatory bowel disease: working with an “unclosed” diary. Qual Health Res. 2011;21(10):1360–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith JA, Osborn M. Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In: Smith JA, editor. Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to research methods. London: Sage; 2003.Google Scholar
  32. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.Google Scholar